Hi all, On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:59:17PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > [...] > > Florian Bruhin wrote: > > Out of curiosity, is there a way I could've found out myself? > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pyqt5webengine doesn't > > seem to say much about this situation. > > Probably not. :-(
Well, there is this page, but its contents can be tricky to decode: https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt Here it says: trying: pyqt5webengine skipped: pyqt5webengine (5, 36, 101) got: 20+0: a-2:a-0:a-0:a-0:i-17:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-1 * amd64: calibre So calibre is the obstacle for pyqt5webengine to migrate. Then you go to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/calibre, which has more information why. By the way, calibre built fine on all architectures now, but now it is blocked on gcc-10. This page has more information on how to parse that file: https://release.debian.org/doc/britney/short-intro-to-migrations.html#debugging-failed-migration-attempts > > I was a bit worried about the exact timeline when this happens, since 27th > > is > > the feature freeze for Ubuntu 20.04, and I'd really like qutebrowser > > v1.10.0 be > > in there (given that it fixes various issues and will be supported by Ubuntu > > for five years). > > Ubuntu takes packages from Unstable (and Experimental, even without > asking why they are in Experimental!), not from Testing. For clarity, automated syncs are only from unstable, if some package was copied from experimental then someone did it manually. -- Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
