On Saturday, March 21, 2020 3:02:27 PM EDT Andrej Shadura wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 19:39, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 18:01, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Andrej, > > > > why the pristine-tar information are now in a `pristine-lfs` branch? > > > > where did the other pristine-tar deltas go? > > > > > > Because it’s simpler and better as it guarantees the tarballs are bit > > > to bit identical, which pristine-tar so often fails to do. There was > > > no pristine-tar or pristine-lfs information for earlier uploads. > > > > but our team policy requires to use pristine-tar: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/poli > > cy.rst > > > > please adjust, so that we can all use the same tools and procedures. > > I suggest we rather change the policy since at the moment this point > lacks any rationale and isn’t providing any benefit since the > pristine-tar data are only useful for minor updates of the package > (e.g. when the upstream source hasn’t changed) and pristine-tar is > known to be a huge hack and fail to provide correct tarballs, > especially when xz is used.
When you joined the team, you agreed to follow the team policies. Please do so. The way to get the policy changed is not to ignore it and then get aggressive when called on it. Personally, I use the pristine-tar branch routinely (I used it multiple times just yesterday) and I've never had a problem with it. Personally, while I know it's a hack, it's a working hack. Please do as you've been asked and then we can have a nice conversation about if we should change the way the team works. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
