On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:41:28 +0200 Tristan Seligmann <mithra...@mithrandi.net> 
wrote:
> I think the upper bound is just bogus and should be removed. Upstream
> seems to have added it under the assumption that cryptography follows
> semver, but it does not: 2.9 to 3.0 offers the same compatibility
> guarantees as 2.8 to 2.9.

There are several backward incompatible changes, as one can see from
the changelog:

https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/blob/master/CHANGELOG.rst

As documented, only "patch" increments are guaranteed to be backward
compatible: https://cryptography.io/en/latest/api-stability/

I'll check and see if azure-cli is affected by those breakages.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

Reply via email to