On Monday 23 March 2009 13:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is > > extra. If you get libyaml moved to optional, I've no problem moving > > pyyaml back to optional. > > I've been in touch with Anders Kaseorg, libyaml's maintainer, and his > next release is going to put it into optional. So, if you don't mind > doing the same, that makes the whole tree nice and consistent. > That's no problem at all. It was optional before it depended on libyaml and I see no reason for it not to be again.
Scott K _______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
