On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > On 2010-12-10, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Jakub Wilk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Source: sympy >>> Version: 0.6.7-1.1 >>> >>> Sympy comes with a test suite, so it would be nice if it could be >>> run at build time, preferably with all supported Python versions. >> >> It takes several minutes to run. Are you sure it's a good idea? > > IMO yes. > >> What happens if some little test fails? > > for the first "run" you can ignore errors, but this way you'll have > the tests executed on the buildds and see what's going on, and then > you'll be able to work to fix what's broken. > >> Is it better to have 99% working package, or not a package at all? > > I'd rather have a 100% working package :)
Sure, me too, but that's not what I was asking. :) > Or a package where tests > failures are ignored (temporarily) to have the time to work on the > code to fix it. Let's ignore the result then, that seems to me like a good solution. Ondrej _______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
