[ Please CC me, I'm not subscribed. Thanks! ] Hi,
I'm in the process of packaging ecspy, which needs python-paver to build. Since this package was removed from unstable, I'd like to re-introduce it into the archive. From the BTS it seems that there were no severe technical reasons for the removal, just lack of interest and no rdepends. (Which would change now.) My question is: What's the preferred mode of dealing with this package? Should I maintain it under the DPMT umbrella? I thought about maintaining ecspy in Debian Science, but as that's a Python module also, DPMT might be the better place for that as well. Opinions? Best regards, Manuel _______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
