Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:52:56 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #748838,
regarding python3-flake8: Missing "flake8-3" binary
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
748838: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748838
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python3-flake8
Version: 2.1.0-2
Hello,
python3-flake8 does not ship a Python 3 aware "flake8-3" (or similar)
program. Instead it just depends on python-flake8 which provides
"flake8".
Thus there is no Python 3 counterpart for "flake8 foo.py", and flake8
complains about Python3 specific constructs.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Martin,
Generally, we're trying to move away from foo-3 variant /usr/bin scripts.
Think about e.g. nosetests2-3 :(
I think it's best to ship one /usr/bin script, and in this case, flake8 is now
a Python 3 script:
$ head /usr/bin/flake8
#! /usr/bin/python3
However, if you want to invoke it with Python 2, or a specific Python version,
you should use the -m option, e.g.:
$ python -m flake8 ...
pgpgklIqo8rhZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
