Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:52:49 +0000
with message-id
<1484146369.2184843.844362080.33d51...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#808459: pywavelets: please make the build reproducible
has caused the Debian Bug report #808459,
regarding pywavelets: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
808459: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808459
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pywavelets
Version: 0.3.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that
pywavelets could not be built reproducibly.
The attached patch removes varying timestamps from the build system. Once
applied, pywavelets can be built reproducibly using our reproducible toolchain.
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
--- a/debian/patches/03-source_date_epoch.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000
+0100
--- b/debian/patches/03-source_date_epoch.patch 2015-12-20 10:44:22.922882957
+0000
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+--- pywavelets-0.3.0.orig/doc/source/conf.py
++++ pywavelets-0.3.0/doc/source/conf.py
+@@ -11,10 +11,14 @@
+ # All configuration values have a default; values that are commented out
+ # serve to show the default.
+
++import os
+ import re
++import time
+ import datetime
+ import jinja2.filters
+
++build_date =
datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(os.environ.get('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH',
time.time())))
++
+ # If extensions (or modules to document with autodoc) are in another
directory,
+ # add these directories to sys.path here. If the directory is relative to the
+ # documentation root, use os.path.abspath to make it absolute, like shown
here.
+@@ -40,7 +44,7 @@ master_doc = 'index'
+
+ # General information about the project.
+ project = 'PyWavelets'
+-copyright = jinja2.filters.do_mark_safe('2006-%s, <a
href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/pywavelets";>The PyWavelets
Developers</a>' % datetime.date.today().year)
++copyright = jinja2.filters.do_mark_safe('2006-%s, <a
href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/pywavelets";>The PyWavelets
Developers</a>' % build_date.year)
+
+ # The version info for the project you're documenting, acts as replacement for
+ # |version| and |release|, also used in various other places throughout the
--- a/debian/patches/series 2015-12-20 10:36:07.735457306 +0000
--- b/debian/patches/series 2015-12-20 10:44:15.587118136 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
01-get_version_from_source.patch
02-remove_privacy_offenders.patch
do_not_rewrite_git_revision_on_build.patch
+03-source_date_epoch.patch
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Daniele,
> Looking at
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/pywavelets.html
>
> it's not clear to me if the package is now reproducible or not,
> icon seem to say the package is reproducible.
The icon is correct! Closing bug (in bcc).
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
