Hi Barry,

Am 25.12.2017 um 21:13 schrieb Barry Warsaw:
> On Dec 23, 2017, at 10:26, Jonas Meurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> we - the Debian Mailman3 maintainers - would like to backport the latest
>> versions of flufl.i18n and flufl.lock from sid/testing to
>> stretch-backports. They're required as dependencies for the Mailman3
>> packages to be backported.
>>
>> Do you have any objections? What's the prefered workflow? We would
>> create a new branch 'stretch-backports' in the packaging repos for that.
>> Is that ok or do you prefer any other workflow for backports to stretch?
> 
> Hi Jonas, et al.
> 
> I have no objections, and in fact I thank you for being so diligent and 
> helpful.  As I am still on hiatus, DPMT is Debian Maintainer of both of these 
> packages, so please just make sure DPMT git is up to date with whatever 
> changes you make. Both packages are still on git-dpm, and I haven’t really 
> been keeping up on the oft-discussed gbp-pqm conversion.  I’m happy for you 
> to do whatever you and DPMT thinks makes the most sense.

Great, I just uploaded backports of flufl.lock and flufl.i18n to
stretch-backports. The backport is in branch 'stretch-backports' in the
packaging repos.

Cheers
 jonas


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

Reply via email to