On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Doug Winter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Have you considered using the @inlineCallbacks decorator instead?  I bet
> you could make that work too, you could write your own decorator that
> uses inlineCallbacks or something synchronous, then the above becomes:
> ...

Good point - I like inlineCallbacks for certain things like tests and
initialization steps, but I try to avoid them in general because it's
too easy to write problematic code with them. I actually fleshed out
these reasons in this stackoverflow answer:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3894278/twisted-deferred-addcallback-vs-yield-and-inlinedeferred/3954427#3954427

Cheers,
Reza

-- 
Reza Lotun
mobile: +44 (0)7521 310 763
email:  [email protected]
work:   [email protected]
twitter: @rlotun
_______________________________________________
python-uk mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk

Reply via email to