FWIW, the most recent build of pywin32 has had less 2.4 downloads (15)
than 2.3 (23), so dropping 2.4 can certainly be done as soon as there is
some concrete advantage.
[hrm - but those download figures are suspect - I'm guessing sourceforge
has recently reset them - but I think 2.4 is as "dead" as 2.3 is for
most people]
Mark
On 16/04/2013 2:26 AM, Roger Upole wrote:
Dropping 2.4 was mentioned, but only in the context if it used vc6. (It's build
with VC7.)
Roger
"Vernon D. Cole" <vernondc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:CAH-ZgAdRVmyO3EtwrYzgug_jvN1K57J=veqhkg0y+hs8kjv...@mail.gmail.com...
I thought Mark approved dropping 2.4. Did I misunderstand?
--
Vernon
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Roger Upole <rup...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I think the uuid module was introduced in python 2.5, might want to bear
that in mind.
Roger
"Vernon D. Cole" <vernondc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:CAH-ZgAeC9D+=1uybyjrztdob6bedjs8ayehrmqp-iyfwonm...@mail.gmail.com...
I am doing a major update to adodbapi, and have an ideal opportunity to
add
a new feature ... but I want to see whether it is a desirable feature...
When reading data from database columns of decimal or date-time data, I
return them to the user as Python decimal.decimal or datetime.datetime
instances. I could do the same thing when reading of column of UUID data
-- Windows data type adGUID -- and return it as an instance of the class
"uuid".
Would that be a good idea, or a bad idea?
--
Vernon Cole
_______________________________________________
python-win32 mailing list
python-win32@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
