https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281470
--- Comment #5 from Charlie Li <vish...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #3) I understand where you're coming from, but at some point, your processes cannot become ports' problem in terms of medium-/long-term maintenance, especially when reflecting upstreams' current (stable) development and support focuses. There are other examples in ports where an upstream project released a new major breaking version, the port updated to such due to upstream's focus going forward, but the previous (unchanged) version copied to a different directory name with those consumers reflecting the change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
