https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268348
Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(python | |@FreeBSD.org) Status|Closed |In Progress URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D52469 CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] Resolution|Not Accepted |--- --- Comment #19 from Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> --- Hello python@, I've reworked the original patch and I wonder if you could take another look. I agree with Charlie that we need to be careful when adding extra options to Python ports. A potential pilot error could lead to a lot of frustration and long debugging. To address that I added an explicit warning to the option description. There is a precedence for such warnings in the ports tree and it is a good middle ground for different ports usergroups. Regarding NumPy's support for NOBLAS: it is fully supported via internal fallback routines. Their implementation is not very performant, however, so the option description warns about that. The new patch is here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52469 Best, Mateusz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
