thanks man for pointing me in the right direction!! but I have to say toward the end of vol2, bonus lesson of PyQT its too much of stuff, the code you went over didnt seemed to fit the scope of 1 video lecture...
although also, thanks for showing blogs of Blarg, Ozgur all I like to see is more and more code. On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Justin Israel <[email protected]>wrote: > Totally agree. Its way better, and I always wanted it to be more pythonic. > I didn't see it as criticism as all. > Was just pointing out to san, the reason I chose to show API 1.0 example, > is all. > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Paul Molodowitch <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Justin Israel <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I wanted to use the API 1.0 to make sure it was fully compatible to >>> people who were still on Maya 2011. Some studios don't upgrade to the new >>> releases right away. But I figured it's good to learn the API 1.0 now, and >>> then just get excited when they make it easier in 2.0. >>> Plus, they don't have every single class ported to API 2.0 (last I >>> checked), and you can't mix objects between the API's >>> >> >> All good points... wasn't meaning to criticize your choice of >> using/teaching 1.0... just wanted to show my appreciation for the hard work >> Chris + Dean put into the 2.0 api. =) >> >> - Paul >> >> >> -- >> view archives: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya >> change your subscription settings: >> http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya/subscribe >> > > -- > view archives: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya > change your subscription settings: > http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya/subscribe > -- ** [image: San's personal blog] <http://feeds.feedburner.com/SanLuthraBlog> * * -- view archives: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya change your subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya/subscribe
