Hi Paul, Thanks, explicit is indeed better than implicit.
I like the idea of always returning a generator and then using list() if needed, but as mentioned earlier I don't want to break any existing code. I could deprecate the current 'find' and then create a new function that always returns a generator and name it more appropriately. If I took this approach and the name was explicit then generate_paths doesn't feel like the correct option. I think find_paths makes more sense? I've even started to question the name of the library now! Thanks again, – John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Ireland" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
