On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:21, Bob Savage wrote:
On Jan 23, 2005, at 11:40 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
I would expect that the majority of actions that people will write in Python will do very little inter-application communication anyway and instead will do things that Python is significantly better than AppleScript at (doing stuff on a network, mangling files, calling into Objective-C frameworks, etc.).
This is consistent with my first reading of the Automator website. It seemed to me that one could write little Python scripts perhaps similar to the "Services" menu, which could be strung together with other "services" inside of Automator as part of a workflow. I once built a whole graphics processing workflow in AppleScript (and a what is now a VERY old version of PhotoShop); there were some things that I might have been able to do in pure AppleScript, but took only two or three lines of Python code to do, so I invoked little Python scripts in a couple of places -- I'm sure many people have similar needs.
The website says that you can invoke shell scripts from Automator, however, so from this angle the main thing missing is a little tutorial.
It does say you can invoke shell scripts, but it does not say how. It may be that they simply expect you to use AppleScript's functionality to do it, or perhaps they have a "do shell script" action. It's not possible to say either way with the given information.
However, since it is not hard to do it from PyObjC as a plugin, and the interface preserves more information and should be easier to use, there is little reason to even consider the shell script option.
-bob
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
