On 19-mei-2005, at 19:39, Jonathan Wight wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 13:32, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 19-mei-2005, at 17:49, Jonathan Wight wrote:
And again with long URLs fixed ;-)
I released the code under the GPL
Why GPL?
Why not?
That's as good an answer as any. I was just wondering. One reason to pick a MIT/BSD license (or even the PSF license) is that it is very unlikely that GPL-ed code will ever be included with Python itself.
Suggest something different.
- with minor modifications to the code I think anyone should be able to create Spotlight Importers using python (without depending on PyObjC)...
Is that a challenge? You cannot create importers using PyObjC at the moment.
Not at all. But feel free to take it as challenge if you wish. Pistols at dawn? ;-)
I chose not to use PyObjC because:
1: I started this before the PyObjC guys had officially released PyObjC for 10.4
2: I'm not an expert in PyObjC.
3: I wasn't sure how to bundle PyObjC with the importer without conflicting with PyObjC already on their machine (see #2)
4: It was pretty quick and easy even without PyObjC.
5: It was fun. ;-)
Jon.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
