On 7-jun-2005, at 10:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Markus Weissmann wrote: > > > >> I think this won't be a big headache for the Python community - not >> even for >> the whole open source people; in fact - as darwin for x86 already is >> available >> for some time now - we've already tested some software on darwin/x86. >> You may find a list of RPMs I've built in end of 2004 for opendarwin >> for Intel >> here [1]. Just check for the py_* named packages and relax! :) >> >> > > That's totally not true, though. Basically, almost NONE of the Mac- > specific Python stuff works correctly on Mac OS X for Intel, and the > changes required to fix that are hard. > Maybe, maybe not. I've quite optimistic about PyObjC (except the inject part, but that's because I'm not interested in that feature). The hard part will be the creation of fat binaries. Ronald _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
