On Nov 2, 2005, at 2:06 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > On 2-nov-2005, at 22:17, Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> Speaking of which, the svn trunk of py2app should be able to >> analyze and write Mach-O headers of any combination of supported >> architectures now (32-bit of both endians, 64-bit of both endians, >> and the universal header that wraps them). It's not really tested >> yet, though. > > Cool. Does that mean that if I'd have a universal binary version of > Python and addon packages I'd end up with a universal binary > application bundle after running py2app?
Almost, the bootstrap is still PPC only for now. That's another issue, because if I ship a universal bootstrap and someone uses it with some subset of PPC-only modules, then the application will not work on a x86 machine since it will run the bootstrap native. There may be some kind of Info.plist flag that can toggle which is the preferred arch, that would be ideal, otherwise I will either have to make py2app smart enough to do something like lipo -thin and split off everything but the preferred arch. Needless to say, universal binary support is going to be a pain! -bob _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
