On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Kevin Ollivier wrote: > On Feb 3, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Bill Northcott wrote: > >> On 04/02/2006, at 12:00 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: >>> This is exactly what TigerPython24Fix is for: >>> http://undefined.org/python/#TigerPython24Fix >> >> As far as I can see this patch is a work around for the binary >> package on Bob's web site. Kevin and I are trying to fix the source >> code. so things build correctly without user level patching. > > Actually, if Python can get along without having _POSIX_C_SOURCE > defined, then removing that define from Python itself is a very > good idea. However, you're right that it only solves the immediate > problem, still leaving the problem that wx cannot be built when > _POSIX_C_SOURCE is defined.
Mac OS X applications can not be built with _POSIX_C_SOURCE is defined, period (pure Darwin stuff doesn't count, obviously). This is an Apple bug, not a wxPython bug... unless wxPython goes out of its way to make that #define like Python does in this particular case. -bob _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
