On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:41:32AM +0100, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > An alternative to fat might be 'ppc,i386'. That is longer, but is > clearer about which architectures are supported (just in case someone > decides to donate support for a threeway universal build). Patching > setuptools to know that an architecture string that contains a comma > is actually a list of architectures shouldn't be too hard.
This sounds like a good idea, and this is not just a legacy issue with ppc64 - we'll likely have a 64-bit x86 Mac variant to handle within the year. -- Nicholas Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley> _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
