On 8-feb-2006, at 22:45, Bill Noon wrote:
On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:Is that this omniorb: http://omniorb.sourceforge.net/ ?Yep.OmniOrb is not a good, simple test case. It creates about a half a dozen libraries and several python modules. Building on MacOSX isn't very clean.Do you by any change have a binary of the python extension for Panther lying about? (for python 2.4 of course). A script that wouldtell if the c++ constructors would also be nice :-)
That's not really a problem, I need some kind of test to determine if we can get away with loading C++ code compiled with g++-3.3 into a python build with gcc 4. Boost might also be an option for testing.
The only version I have for Panther was built against python 2.3 (and static libraries).If you have a version of python2.4 for Panther you want me to test, we can try it that way.
I'd like to have a binary that was build with an existing python 2.4 (Bob's "unofficial official" build) on Panther, but don't bother building just for this test; I'll reboot into 10.3 to build some test code.
Ronald
Ronald--Bill Noon--Bill
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
