On 11-feb-2006, at 22:29, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 11, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:On 10-feb-2006, at 5:08, Brendan Simons wrote:On 9-Feb-06, at 8:10 PM, Chris Barker wrote:further still if PyObjC ends up shipping with some version of OS X.That would make a big difference.Thirded. Glad to hear it's been added to the Apple buglist.I'm not so sure if I would like this, that would make it a lot harder to provide updates to PyObjC for the system version of Python. Although the "Apple ships my software with the OS"-factor would be pretty neat :-). On the other hand, I don't use Apple's python much anyway.They might as well ship it, and then we can treat it the same as we do everything else they ship: if it's not good enough for your purposes, here's a third party Python distribution and upgrades.It would be terribly useful if I could use PyObjC in system scripts or whatever for 10.5+.
That would indeed be nice. And it's not as if PyObjC is changing very much at the moment.
Ronald
-bob
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
