FWIW here are 3 runs from 1.83GHz MacBook Pro.... [sprout:2132]> /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/bin/python -c "from test.pystone import pystones; print pystones()" (2.0400000000000005, 24509.803921568622) =============================================================== 2006-04-06 14:35[sprout:2132]> /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/bin/python -c "from test.pystone import pystones; print pystones()" (2.0299999999999998, 24630.541871921185) =============================================================== 2006-04-06 14:35[sprout:2132]> /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/bin/python -c "from test.pystone import pystones; print pystones()" (2.0800000000000005, 24038.461538461532) Ted On Apr 6, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Shane Holloway (IEEE) wrote: I was just wondering if anyone else had compared pystones on their box? I downloaded the latest Universal Build from the python.org and found things to be a bit sluggish. So I ran the pystones test to quickly gauge things, and noticed that things are indeed running about 1/3 of what they should be. (Specific info from the Terminal below.) Anyone have ideas? They both appear to be built from GCC 4.0. Let me know what other information you need from me. ---- Ted Leung Blog: <http://www.sauria.com/blog> This message is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private |
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig