On Thursday, April 13, 2006, at 11:53PM, Zachary Pincus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> So... I have found that IPython exposes a bug in GNU readline 5.1, >>> sadly enough. This bug causes segfaults when the up-arrow key is >>> used under certain situations. Ugh. Fortunately, the extant >>> readline 5.1 patches solve this issue nicely. Hopefully you'll get >>> a chance in the near future to update the Universal MacPython >>> 2.4.3 distribution so that it doesn't have this issue. >> >> Which patch? Please provide a link to that patch, I won't go >> hunting for it. > >I don't really like how they do it, but on the readline page ( http:// >tiswww.tis.case.edu/~chet/readline/rltop.html ) they give you a link >to download the latest version of readline ( ftp://ftp.cwru.edu/pub/ >bash/readline-5.1.tar.gz ) as well as the link to the patch directory >( ftp://ftp.cwru.edu/pub/bash/readline-5.1-patches ). I don't know >why they don't spin out x.x.1 point releases to fix known bugs, but >they don't, and instead provide the fixes as patches. So any readline >build must include the current sources and any patches for that >version to be considered bug-free. What a pain. You can say that. The bad part of this scheme is that they don't say this. I saw this directory when I downloaded readline, but assumed that these were patches that may or may not end up in a future version of readline. > >>> Also, a related query: Is there somewhere in the Python Framework >>> structure that is appropriate for placing dynamic libraries that >>> Python would link to? Judicious use of the install_name_tool and >>> friends could produce a libreadline.dylib that the python binary >>> would expect at a particular relative path from itself. This would >>> allow that library to be dynamically linked, yet still live within >>> (and be distributed with) the framework. Just a thought -- but it >>> might be more work than it's worth. >> >> I don't see what this would buy us. It is possible to do this, but >> IMHO not really worth the trouble. > >It doesn't buy much really, except obviating the need to re-link >python every time a library needs to be changed. So in this case, >Michael could have built a fixed readline, put it in the right place, >and gone on his merry way with the MacPython distribution. Instead he >had to rebuild python himself, from scratch. It's not a big deal >though either way. I was just mentioning the possibility, but not >really advocating for it. He could have done this even now, readline is a python extension and it is not very hard to build an installer for just readline. Ronald > >Zach > > _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
