On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:14, Christopher Barker wrote: > My primary comment is that you're discussing building a Universal > package, but keeping the external libs installed with the standard > "make > install". I haven't tried your scheme yet, but usually that results in > dynamic libs being built, sometimes by themselves, and sometimes along > with the static libs. The trick here is that you can sometimes get the > dynamic libs instead of the static ones when you link. Either way, it > will work fine on your system, but there's really no point in > building a > Universal Package if you're not trying to distribute it (or a Py2App > bundle built with it)
Good point. In fact, though I was able to compile 'FAT' static libs, the shared libs are all just i386--I just now checked. BUt I linked against the static lib so things are fine this time, but more care in the future to ensure the shared libs are not found would be prudent and I'll take note of it. _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
