On 23-mei-2006, at 14:56, Kent Quirk wrote: > This is a patch and explanation (written by one of my co-workers) > related to a question I posted to this list on 5/10.
It might be just me, but I don't really understand why py2app tries to thin architectures in the first place. The only file it may have to thin is its own executable stub, because the OS uses that to decide if an application can run natively or not (that's not entirely true, but good enough). I want to do a new release of PyObjC soon, but want to check the universal binary support in py2app first. That code seems to have some rough edges at the moment. Ronald _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
