On 21 Jun 2006, at 11:35, Dan White wrote: > > On 20 Jun 2006, at 20:40, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > >> >> On 20-jun-2006, at 19:08, Dan White wrote: >> >>> >>> On 15 Jun 2006, at 10:55, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 15-jun-2006, at 9:28, Dan White wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So yes there are some DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH suff set. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe therein lies the problem...? >>>>> Python probably doesn't know about that stuff? >>>> >>>> That might be the problem, and seems to indicate that Intel does >>>> something completely wrong. Any use of the DYLD_* variables in a >>>> production environment is an indication that something fishy is >>>> going on. Unlike linux executables on osx contain the full path >>>> to libraries they link to. If DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is needed the >>>> compiler doesn't include the full path to some libraries that >>>> are needed. It should be possible to teach py2app/macholib about >>>> this "feature" of the intel compiler, but you'll probably have >>>> to do that yourself. >>> >>> I tried fixing the .dylibs in my application bindle (made by py2app) >>> that were unable to find libguide.dylib >>> using for instance >>> >>> install_name_tool -change libguide.dylib @executable_path/../ >>> Frameworks/libguide.dylib /Users/dan/Desktop/bioimagexdsvn/trunk/ >>> dist/BioImageXD.app/Contents/MacOS/../Frameworks/ >>> libvtkGraphicsPythonD.5.1.dylib >> >> Hmm, this could turn out to be interesting :-). Could you check >> the license of the intel compiler, are you allowed to do this? >> >> BTW. A better fix would be to rewrite the install_name of the >> libguide.dylib in /opt/intel/cc/.../, then py2app would >> automaticly copy the library and rewrite the install_name. > > here is the license from intel pages for the OS X intel compilers > > http://www.intel.com/cd/software/products/asmo-na/eng/compilers/ > cmac/267042.htm > > doesn't look good. > Even the non profit license does not seem to allow redistribution > of their materials. > Which seems rather odd, since the libguide.dyli is no use to anyone > who isnt using their compiers > or binaries generated by them, > so they only stand to gain by their redistribution with fast intel > compiled binaries... > > > big business..... > > i will ask for clarification regarding open source free software > projects. > > Dan
Actually on further inspection, there is a file with a list of redistrubutable files: List of Re-distributable files for the Intel(R) C++ Compiler for Mac OS: libguide.a libguide.dylib libguide_stats.a libguide_stats.dylib libimf.a libimf.dylib libirc.a libirc.dylib libirc_s.a libompstub.a libsvml.a libsvml.dylib libipgo.a so maybe that means it is fine to bundle libguide.dylib in a .app Dan Dr. Daniel James White BSc. (Hons.) PhD Bioimaging Coordinator Nanoscience Centre and Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences Division of Molecular Recognition Ambiotica C242 PO Box 35 University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä FIN 40014 Finland +358 14 260 4183 (work) +358 468102840 (mobile) http://www.bioimagexd.org http://www.chalkie.org.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
