On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > <sarcasm> > It is rather obvious that nobdy here really cares about 10.3.9. The 2.4.3 > universal installer has been out for ages and there have been test releases > before the production release and nobody seems to have tested on 10.3.9 until > now. > </sarcasm> > > I don't use 10.3 myself and have reason for supporting 10.3 other than that > it seems to be a Good Thing (TM) to have. Given that I'm working on Python in > my free time and don't have too much of that one can expect that 10.3.9 > support for the binary installers will be less than optimal.
We use the 2.4.3 build on 10.3.9 and test it extensively. We just don't use bzip2. :) Just wanted to add one vote for 10.3.9 still being important -- I think about 30% of our Mac users are on it. -M _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
