Bob,
Of course that makes sense. One runs each setup.py with the python
version intended to install the package under. Apologies to Ronald--
not that I thought he did anything incorrectly, I was just assuming
he might have done something to protect us. What do you know, I learn
something new every single day.
In fact I have my 2.5 and 2.4 side-by-side so to speak and working
quite independently it seems now that I look at it.
"That's the future gentlemen. What a fascinating modern age we live in."
-- 'Lucky' Jack, Captain of HMS Surprise, "Master and Commander, the
Far Side of the World
Daniel
On Jul 26, 2006, at 10:39, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Daniel Lord wrote:
>
>> I just tried the PIL build with the 2.5b version and it fails but
>> the 2.4.3 version works fine...see below.
>> My hunch is Ronald might have disabled some paths in order to keep
>> the beta from interfering with the standard 2.4 install. Or not ;-)
>> Ronald what say you?
>
> Each Python installation has its own site-packages dir. Ronald
> didn't do anything to it, that's how Python works on every
> platform. It has to be that way, extensions and bytecode aren't
> compatible across minor versions.
>
> -bob
_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
