Cool - I didn't mean to imply that GitHub was the only choice, and Mercurial is certainly more popular with the Python crowd. As long as there's something that'll make it possible to patch and document bugs, it'll be a great improvement.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com>wrote: > > > On 26 Jul, 2010,at 03:51 AM, Tom MacWright <t...@developmentseed.org> > wrote: > > Here's a patch that converts the freerange tests in altgraph into unit > tests: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/68059/patches/altgraph_unittest.patch > > It's rather simple and doesn't add any new tests. There isn't test coverage > of Dot, etc., and I'd like to add it. I'm happy to see that there are solid > plans for the future of these modules, but in order to make these happen, is > there going to be any kind of development infrastructure? Even putting these > on GitHub or setting up a Trac somewhere would do a tremendous amount of > good: right now, for people who want to contribute (this guy), it seems like > there's absolutely no way to get involved, relative to other projects. > > > I have an account at bitbucket and intend to migrate the repositories > there, mostly because bitbucket has a tracker and other infrastructure. > W.r.t. picking mercurial instead of git: CPython is moving to mercurial as > well and I prefer to keep the number of version management systems that I > actively use as small as possible. > > I need to check with Bob if he minds, but I don't expect problems there as > he's not doing any work on py2app anymore. > > Ronald >
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG
