> > I am writing some utilities to control a custom USB device; would you > recommend using 1.0 at this point? > The short answer is yes. The long answer is that despite the fact PyUSB 1.0 is still alpha, features implemented has shown being quite stable, if you take the download ratio compared to problems people have been facing. But you should look on features that are currently available. For example, you want what to retrieve string descriptors, you will have to cope with ctrl_transfer function directly, as standard control requests support is not yet implemented, and, as explained earlier, there is no prevision on when it will be... Also, be prepared to change your code when updating to a new release, as in alpha stage API is subject to change (either in interface or in semantics). If that risks are ok for you, go ahead, I agree 1.0 is a much better API.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ pyusb-users mailing list pyusb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyusb-users
