On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Emmanuel Blot <eblot...@gmail.com> wrote: > The switch from libusb to libusbx is not confusing -on its own- to me. > > However, IMHO it is quite fuzzy to have a module that currently > installs on Wheezy version 1.0.11, whereas libusb official latest > release is 1.0.9...
No surprise to see libusbx 1.0.11 there if you use Debian Stable which often lag significantly behind. And the Debian package page at least mentions the source package is from libusbx. http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libusb-1.0-0 > > Moreover, the Debian package web page > http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libusb-1.0-0 shows that "homepage" > is "www.linux-usb.org", not libusbx.org. That is a mistake on the Debian libusbx packager's part. > You have to know the whole story of libusb to understand > what's going on there… I can understand that. The fork is an unfortunate one but there is no way out. The reason is clearly stated here. http://libusbx.org/ -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ pyusb-users mailing list pyusb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyusb-users
