2014-05-11 0:10 GMT-03:00 Xiaofan Chen <xiaof...@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Wander Lairson Costa
> <wander.lair...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2014-05-10 5:48 GMT-03:00 Jim Easterbrook <j...@jim-easterbrook.me.uk>:
>>> On 09/05/14 23:21, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
>>>> HID devices are problematic with libusb, and since PyUSB depends on
>>>> libusb, pyusb can't handle HID devices either. A better way should to
>>>> use hidapi [1].
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.signal11.us/oss/hidapi/
>>>
>>> Note that on Linux hidapi uses libusb as a backend by default.
>>> https://github.com/signal11/hidapi/tree/master/linux
>>>
>>> PS What are the problems with HID devices and pyusb? I'm using it with
>>> weather stations that have an HID interface and it seems to work OK.
>>> --
>>
>> This information came from libusb ML, maybe things changed now. So,
>> the problem might be just a matter of unloading the HID driver...
>
> Major problem with libusb and HID device is the lack of HID backend
> under Mac OS X. Under Linux, libusb works fine with HID device (need
> to detach the kernel HID driver). Under Windows, there are some
> limitations as well. So HIDAPI is better in terms of cross-platform
> support.
>

Thanks for clarifying.

Best Regards,
Wander Lairson Costa

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
pyusb-users mailing list
pyusb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyusb-users

Reply via email to