| Dvorapa added a comment. |
In T179775#4141000, @Framawiki wrote:is this wanted and supported by the Pywikibot maintainers when it comes to quick reviewing of patches?
IMO we're actually fast enough to review simple patches. Rereading the larger ones is already more complex.
Obviously, larger patches takes time, but simple patches are really fast.
In T179775#4141145, @Aklapper wrote:Well, it's not about "objections" here. It's about committing to maintain a list of tasks suitable for starters, to help, to review their code. :)
We will try to list all info needed from that page on some Pywikibot subpage on mediawiki.org, would it be okay?
In T179775#3965672, @Aklapper wrote:https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/pywikibot/2016-August/009493.html might only be an individual opinion and things might have changed, but it worries me when it comes to patch review of new contributions.
This is more like past issue now, both participants are not actively working on Pywikibot since then and (although we miss every retired developer) the developer base moved to different people who are continuously working on "making Pywikibot great again".
Cc: Dalba, zhuyifei1999, jayvdb, Mpaa, Xqt, Dvorapa, srishakatux, Aklapper, pywikibot-bugs-list, Framawiki, Jayprakash12345, Magul, Tbscho, MayS, Mdupont, JJMC89, Avicennasis, Gryllida, Masti, Alchimista, Rfarrand, Rxy, jeremyb, Qgil
_______________________________________________ pywikibot-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot-bugs
