Xqt added a comment.
In T278046#7122672 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T278046#7122672>, @atagar wrote: >> Don't see any advantage. > > Isn't the advantage that epytext is unmaintained as of 2008 and reSt is the documentation format most python projects use? For my part I've extensively worked with Sphinx's reSt whereas pywikibot is the first time I've ever seen epytext. It would be nice for pywikibot newcomers not to need to learn an obsolete documentation format unless we have significant reason to do so. Ok that might be a good reason to switch completey. I am fine with it. Sphinx is already supported and there is only the Link shortener which can be useful. The conversion is made in` conf.pywikibot_epytext_to_sphinx()` function. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T278046 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Xqt Cc: atagar, jayvdb, Huji, Aklapper, Xqt, pywikibot-bugs-list, Shalomori123, Jyoo1011, JohnsonLee01, SHEKH, Dijkstra, Khutuck, Zkhalido, Urstrulykkr, Viztor, Wenyi, Tbscho, MayS, Mdupont, JJMC89, Dvorapa, Altostratus, Avicennasis, mys_721tx, Masti, Alchimista
_______________________________________________ pywikibot-bugs mailing list -- pywikibot-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to pywikibot-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
