happy5214 added a comment.
I'll admit that I'm not an expert on bug management policy, but I've seen tasks (both bugs and enhancements) that are over a decade old, just sitting there completely forgotten, and I've even tried to fix a couple. The priorities of this and its subtasks are way off (they should probably be Lowest), but what exactly is the harm in leaving these open? Unless there's a plan to remove the existing Flow code from Pywikibot too (which would be a personal shame and a disappointment for anyone on Flow-enabled wikis who uses Pywikibot on talk pages), some of the features with tasks didn't end up being implemented in Flow, or the Pywikibot maintainers specifically say they don't want these to be implemented, I see no harm leaving these tasks open for someone to work on in the future. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T109229 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: happy5214 Cc: Ladsgroup, Multichill, pywikibot-bugs-list, Ricordisamoa, Xqt, Mattflaschen-WMF, jayvdb, Qgil, Niharika, EBernhardson, rmoen, gerritbot, Legoktm, happy5214, Aklapper, Liuxinyu970226, Jyoo1011, JohnsonLee01, SHEKH, Dijkstra, Khutuck, Zkhalido, Viztor, Nickleh, Wenyi, Tbscho, MayS, Mdupont, JJMC89, Dvorapa, Altostratus, Avicennasis, mys_721tx, Dinoguy1000, Masti, Alchimista
_______________________________________________ pywikibot-bugs mailing list -- pywikibot-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to pywikibot-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
