Yes, um, how hard would it be to generate these using not-non-free stuff? <https://wiki.python.org/moin/CodeCoverage> pointed me to <https://coverage.readthedocs.org/en/coverage-4.0.1/> which looked promising.
-- Legoktm On 10/10/2015 12:51 PM, Ricordisamoa wrote: > non-free > > Il 10/10/2015 13:20, Amir Ladsgroup ha scritto: >> Hey, >> Now we have reports of code coverage in codecov.io >> <http://codecov.io>. Code coverage is basically percentage of >> statements executed during tests comparing to all statements in a package. >> Right now 73% of pywkibot library is covered but only 10% of scripts >> are being tested. For more detailed report (per file) see this >> <https://codecov.io/github/wikimedia/pywikibot-core>. >> Note that Appveyor tests are not included in the report yet >> <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/244878>. >> >> Some steps that can make pywikibot test coverage better: >> * Write tests for scripts >> * site.py, page.py and pagegenerators.py have noticeable number of >> missing statements >> <https://codecov.io/github/wikimedia/pywikibot-core/pywikibot?ref=84f5efd03d7fb86eafb6aae1a8af3e0a5cd85a66#sort=missing&dir=desc>. >> We can write tests for them. >> * Try coverage suggestions >> <https://codecov.io/github/wikimedia/pywikibot-core/features/suggestions?ref=84f5efd03d7fb86eafb6aae1a8af3e0a5cd85a66> >> >> Let's talk about how we can have better tests! >> Best >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pywikibot mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot > > > > _______________________________________________ > pywikibot mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot > _______________________________________________ pywikibot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot
