I'm in favor of +2ing patches but most of open patches have -1 or -2 in their code review part.
Best On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > A better way would be to commit some patches. There are a lot of proposals > which have minor changes and could be approved quickly. > > best > > xqt > > ----- Original Nachricht ---- > Von: Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected]> > An: Pywikibot discussion list <[email protected]> > Datum: 09.02.2016 18:10 > Betreff: [pywikibot] Number of open changesets > > > Hello, > > Per stats > > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Reports/Changesets_by_project>. > > There are 305 open change sets in pywikibot/core which make us the second > > project after mediawiki/core in number of open change sets. Open change > > sets won't do any harm but sometimes it's hard to find good patches in > pool > > of out-of-date-or-not-needed-anymore patches. > > > > Some projects have rules like "if a change set has -2 for more than N > > weeks, it can be abandoned" it can work for us. Also I think if we look > > into our own old patches we might find several patches that are not > needed > > anymore due to several reasons such as being implemented another way, too > > big schema change in pywikibot, etc. We can abandon them. Please check > your > > old patches. > > > > Best > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pywikibot mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot > > >
_______________________________________________ pywikibot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot
