> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 2:40 PM, <i...@gno.de> wrote: > > > Hi Amir, > > > > I am against this breaking change and I do not see the advantage for > that. > > The big advantage is after using this version there is no need to download > and install more after downloading PWB compat and this is really helpful > for people who are using servers in order to run bots (because they doesn't > have admin rights to install beautifulsoup) and more than 100 projects are > using this way so why not us?
I agree with having BeautifulSoup as part of the framework (which was it til few months ago). It is a main part of the compat branch and no script will run without it. As suggested (see below) I would prefer the alternate bs3 i.e. BeautifulSoup.py eighter in topmost folder (as it was previously) or in the external folder. I do not see any advantage for bs4 and your renaming. > > > > I guess we will never have a compat release for python 3+. > > This is in my TODO list but not a big priority because nobody like python 3 I do not dislike py3+ but I do not like a lot of pywikbot branches because it is hard to work to keep them on the same level. core branch was started 6 years ago and it needs this time to be accepted by more and more bot owners. If we try to merge to py3+ we should do it with core imho > > > > Therefore we could have the BeautifulSoup.py in the topmost folder (as we > > had before some patching changes) or in the externals folder (as we have > it > > while downloaded by its first use whicht is made by > externals.__init__.py). > > > > We just need to set an amend for it, not a big deal. I'll do very soon Be aware there could be other scripts from bot owners using beautifulsoup directliy and not via pywikibot/wikipedia module. > > Greetings xqt _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
