On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 05:52 -0700, Peter A. Bigot wrote: > I hadn't heard of buildout before you mentioned it. PyXB's PyPI > presence is somewhat half-hearted, as I've avoided the whole egg thing: > I really need the distribution to install without requiring tools that > don't come with Python, and without trying to go download arbitrary > stuff. As such, it's not unlikely that the way I've registered things > is not what buildout is expecting. > > Can you specify the file you want by url? > > I haven't uploaded 1.1.0 there yet, so I could fix it for that version, > if I knew what would work. Perhaps the solution is to not provide the > documentation on PyPI, only upload the base file, and refer people to > SourceForge if they want any of the overlays. > > Peter
Hi Peter, Probably only putting PyXB-full on PyPi is the best solution. While I appreciate you interest in providing the various components. Someone (like me) that is interested in using all of PyXB (I think anyway, since I'm not certain what I really need or don't). It may be best to only put PyXB-full on PyPi ??? As you can tell I am not an XML expert. I am using PyXB as a quick (I hope) way to create Python bindings for SDMX-HD http://www.sdmx-hd.org Thanks for your help. Cheers, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ pyxb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyxb-users
