> On March 4, 2013, 3:45 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
> > blockerbugs/util/bz_interface.py, line 49
> > <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/3/?file=151#file151line49>
> >
> >     So I gather you rather not load the app to load the url from the 
> > config, right?

In that particular code - yeah, I'd rather avoid it. There are no direct 
dependencies on the blockerbugs code in there and I'd rather keep it that way. 
The rest of the BBA should be passing in a bugzilla url when the interface 
object is created and getting that URL from config, though


> On March 4, 2013, 3:45 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
> > blockerbugs/templates/base_nav.html, line 23
> > <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/3/?file=147#file147line23>
> >
> >     Not necessary anymore with t332 in develop.

Yeah, I forgot that t332 made it to develop already - will update the diff.


> On March 4, 2013, 3:45 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
> > blockerbugs/__init__.py, line 7
> > <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/3/?file=142#file142line7>
> >
> >     For what?

Good catch - that isn't supposed to be there anymore


> On March 4, 2013, 3:45 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
> > blockerbugs/templates/propose_bug.html, line 145
> > <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/3/?file=148#file148line145>
> >
> >     Maybe an overkill but we could load the release number dynamically?

Yeah, that shouldn't be too hard to do. The URL structure may change in the 
future but we can deal with that if/when it happens


- Tim


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/#review13
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 1, 2013, 6:19 a.m., Tim Flink wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 1, 2013, 6:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for blockerbugs.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 334
>     https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/334
> 
> 
> Repository: blockerbugs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Initial code for blocker submission page
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   testing/test_bugchange.py PRE-CREATION 
>   sync_db.py 590d80adbf86bc9f7c27a4a8a0d46f5570c303f1 
>   setup.py 32cf5b26caac1aced1dde2f0bf29d94bc2bebe83 
>   initialize.py a6cd0a2766aaf88e8d87a4f72d6721075f6a219d 
>   init_f18db.sh c20df66c4b4a8f38ab79a1b61043d26de112f71c 
>   conf/blockerbugs.wsgi dcd819f4c4080546c84bd48f604ae6469d70d98a 
>   blockerbugs/util/bz_interface.py 2bae79db2d3a1206b7de1cee5f005f137ba2d6f3 
>   blockerbugs/util/bug_sync.py 110fbe983a5cf177c35a9966162d0de23cf98d18 
>   blockerbugs/templates/thanks.html PRE-CREATION 
>   blockerbugs/templates/propose_bug.html PRE-CREATION 
>   blockerbugs/templates/base_nav.html 
> f3a89798a9dadf297e722c067ad3795a72ebbf74 
>   blockerbugs/controllers/main.py 21bf27ce593a1398b1a08a6a4bcfc1d34146c027 
>   blockerbugs/controllers/forms.py caae0e5b201fc6d85930246c31159ebbbe4f9ab7 
>   blockerbugs/controllers/admin.py 01196b3d9b7284ebcab8bf1db061ad69f2d5f250 
>   blockerbugs/config.py 75cf777d31e7fc3bfe3256704cd349e3ca88c866 
>   blockerbugs/__init__.py cae54ab562f8a17a4473aa0bc58a73dacf5225f9 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've done quite a bit of local testing and there is a staging instance 
> available: https://209.132.184.132/blockerbugs
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tim Flink
> 
>

_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Reply via email to