> > Anyway, I just wanted to bring it to your attention and see what you > > think. > > Thanks for bringing it to our attention. I think this might end up > being more fuel to the fire of "replace depcheck with something saner", > though. I have some ideas on how to do that, just need to find the time > to get it done or someone else who's interested in doing the work :-/
I've been pondering lately about the current state of depcheck. Several times someone asked about its incorrect results (mainly when it said "failed" and everything was OK) and I needed to reply "sorry". I still think it is more often right than wrong, but does it make sense to keep it around in its current state? We don't work on it, we don't understand its internals properly, we know its architecture is flawed. Maybe it's time to put it to rest? Some people read its results, but how many have we discouraged from doing so? I'm afraid that many of them. _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
