-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2013 05:23 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > I'm fine with either direction for now. My hesitation on getting > started with 1) is that having a beaker installation is still an > evaluation for us. I have a hard time seeing things not working out > but I also don't pretend to be clarvoyant :) > > If you guys are fine with putting work into something that will > probably change (see comment below about ansible), I can get the > ball rolling to separate the ACL for the beaker server and get you > all the access you need. Otherwise, I can just apply the updates > myself. Let me know if you all have a preference on which route to > take right now.
If you're happy to do the update, I think it makes more sense for you to handle this one. The beaker-project.org repos should have 0.15.1 available now, and the upgrade instructions are at http://beaker-project.org/docs/whats-new/upgrade-0.15.html Vaguely related: it would be handy if beaker.fedoraproject.org redirected to the Beaker installation :) Cheers, Nick. - -- Nick Coghlan Red Hat Infrastructure Engineering & Development, Brisbane Testing Solutions Team Lead Beaker Development Lead (http://beaker-project.org/) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSc2m0AAoJEHEkJo9fMO/LNk8H+wXpgftonJmnBPOEODEGkbfw QM2czldUFcvfHT+Tx3owHT/wtmjpccme3GI5Bq1dFi9XvR0EPtTlua1PvT04DSzj fdQnFYEiRia3QV4TY79VWbIpG5q5fFuKRF+SBBWaVaw4IhHNj7Swh/hmCVWrcG19 0cYc3GkBJiRIv67e5gWzos0zOF1yvu+7J2L+F8UV2NMKtk5CneYi2p/K9vBrUvB6 uIVZb+Fop6BD9jX9YRBzBTMSrmj1bAt8dOOdBjU05MtaoFlY4p4YKsmo1DuMTqDJ eIp+BvZg2NgKlKO5me8wSjByDR8igRtV5kSCMYaskv4u95bTq2x4Z0rpNidewhQ= =FDsv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
