-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/#review118
-----------------------------------------------------------


I like the concept but I disagree with your sort order change. While we 
_shouldn't_ have out-of-date updates displayed, it does happen and I think that 
we should be prioritizing the newer update over the update that's earlier in 
the pipeline (ie pending-testing over testing and testing over stable).


blockerbugs/__init__.py
<http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/#comment146>

    Bah, have we really been running this whole time with unclosed <span> tags 
on the update status labels?



blockerbugs/models/update.py
<http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/#comment145>

    Why is this sort order change an improvement? If an older update is pending 
while a newer update is stable, we'd want to show the newer update


- Tim Flink


On Dec. 10, 2013, 3:54 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 10, 2013, 3:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for blockerbugs.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 438
>     https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/438
> 
> 
> Repository: blockerbugs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> commit 911781af9cc06e27c0a8580f07f7673c90e7329d
> Author: Martin Krizek <mkri...@redhat.com>
> Date:   Tue Dec 10 16:28:52 2013 +0100
> 
>     Sort updates by (status.desc(), pending.desc())
>     
>     This way an update label is correctly set when multiple updates fix a
>     bug. The label is chosen by the following order (the lowest one):
>     
>     pending testing < testing < pending stable < stable
>     
>     Fixes: #438
> 
> Note: the rest of the issues with displaying label is handled outside this 
> ticket in https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T21
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   blockerbugs/models/update.py 89c083da5c91558d4dead118c67e4a1138b8cae1 
>   blockerbugs/controllers/main.py 1795ed1d717bb85e0f3d9e7e7008d68c2aae36d8 
>   blockerbugs/__init__.py dcf6c5aadb24e6d86e95d5bb3d608b81721de47f 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Sorting seems to be working as expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Krizek
> 
>

_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel

Reply via email to