> I've posted a comparison between Sphinx and Dexy [1] - as well as > updated the phabricator ticket [2]. The tools are pretty similar in > what they can produce, so it really comes down to what people are > comfortable with. The learning curve for Dexy isn't steep, and I think > it's just enough easier to use compared to Sphinx for our purposes.
I wondered why I hadn't seen it at Fedora Planet (neither your previous blogpost), and it's because your RSS feed is no longer updated: http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/feeds/fedora.atom.xml > I wasn't able to find air-tight reasoning for one over the other for > qa-devel work - but found dexy a bit easier to use and template. Source > for both tutorials can be found on my bitbucket profile [3]. Thanks. Can you move it into our team repo list? https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa > > // Roshi > > [1] http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/comparing-dexy-and-sphinx.html > [2] https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T39 > [3] https://bitbucket.org/Rorosha/doc-tools > _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
