> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:49:58 -0400 (EDT) > Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > The trigger is a piece of code which is responsible for starting > > > > the process of task execution. > > > > > > In this whole email you say 'task'. Do you mean 'check' in our usual > > > terminology, or something else? Especially when describing the data > > > structures. > > > > Now I realized that we started to use 'check' in the code, but all > > our git repos are named 'task-*', and some of the READMEs use that > > term as well. Another thing to put in sync? > > I suppose it depends on whether we want to use the current CheckDetail > implementation for non-check tasks. If we don't, then I think we'll > want to have something similar.
What are non-check tasks? :) > > For the other doc stuff, yeah, we should probably get things in sync. > > Tim It's Task-o-tron, it suggests it's meant to execute _tasks_ :-) On the other hand, check is more specific than task, it explains the purpose better. I guess native speakers will need to deal with language subtleties. I just want to be consistent in naming, it helps us and our users, that's all. _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
