> - Are we OK with saying "anything run by libtaskotron has to be gpl3 > compatible"? This gets into another area that I'm personally fuzzy > on (the line between derivative and usage) but I don't know of any > gpl2-only or agpl libraries that we'd want to use with libtaskotron > so this may end up being a non-issue entirely
As long as the checks don't link to us, and they simply return TAP output, there is no such requirement, I believe. When it comes to linking, I'm not clear what that means ATM. > I'd appreciate thoughts on the issues here. I'm leaning towards > "re-license as gpl3 and take the code from ansible" but I could be > missing some complication here. It was a long time ago I studied licensing stuff and I don't remember much. But as a rule of thumb, I have no objection against GPL3+. And it shouldn't prevent us from using GPL2+ libraries and code, just GPL2-only, I believe. So the impact doesn't seem that bad. _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
