> That being said, the kernel-style DCO [1] might be worth considering. > Nothing fancy, just documentation that lists the DCO and says that by > contributing code, you agree to its terms. I'm not sure we need to deal > with signing off on code since we don't have a complicated merge > process, though. > > This is almost no barrier to entry and reduces the possibility for > folks to be confused about which license they're contributing under. > Overall, I figure it covers most of the use cases we're interested in > (other than possibly reverting back to an older license, which isn't a > big deal) without causing un-needed problems.
I thought that the ability to revert to an older license was one of the reasons for the proposal. I'm not sure why it's not a big deal anymore? Unfortunately I don't have any further comments or recommendations, because I'm utterly lost in this legal mumbo-jumbo, sorry. _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
