Hi Tim, just a small ping :)
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:17:50AM +1000, Róman Joost wrote: > > [...] > > This was less of a desired final outcome for us than it was the easiest > > way to get started. > > > > I think that our current method of having gigantic text-only log files > > is far from optimal (and something that we did years ago in AutoQA > > before making the logs more easily accessible) but we haven't improved > > the log accessibility/readability in taskotron yet. > > Good to know. I guess this is something to discuss and work on? > > > 3. Are there plans/ideas on implementing a waiver mechanism? > > > > Yeah, it'll have to happen before we start gating any > > rawhide/branched/stable builds or updates for Fedora. We don't have a > > design yet but it'll happen at some point. > If this thread has reached a dead end, I think the best way forward is to come up with an implementation proposal for either of the two items: keeping more test informatin in resultsdb or a waiver mechanism. Kind Regards, -- Róman Joost Software Engineer, HSS - Software Engineering and Development (Brisbane) email: [email protected] | tz: UTC+10 irc: #hss #rpmdiff
pgpI95jSTNy30.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
